Blog  /  Employment Discrimination

Employment Discrimination

ABM Settles EEOC Disability Charge Over Failure to Communicate with Deaf Worker

TS
TAP Series Editorial 2 min read
ABM Settles EEOC Disability Charge Over Failure to Communicate with Deaf Worker

Background:
In June 2022, ABM Industry Groups, a prominent facilities management company, offered a job to a deaf worker as a warehouse cleaner in one of its clients' facilities. After receiving the job offer, the worker requested a reasonable accommodation due to his deafness. ABM initiated discussions with Norcal Services for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing to explore potential accommodations. Still, despite these initial talks, the worker experienced a prolonged period without a start date or further communication from ABM.

Settlement:
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) investigated the situation and found that ABM's lack of communication and failure to provide timely accommodation potentially violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA mandates that employers provide reasonable accommodations to employees with disabilities, barring undue hardship. After the investigation, ABM and the EEOC entered into a pre-litigation conciliation process, resulting in a settlement.

Under the terms of the settlement, ABM agreed to pay the worker $52,000 in monetary damages. Additionally, the company committed to revising its non-discrimination policies and conducting training for its managers and employees at the relevant locations to ensure compliance with ADA requirements.

Key Takeaways:

  • Employers are obligated under the ADA to provide reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities, ensuring they have equal access to employment opportunities.
  • Effective communication is crucial in the accommodation process. Employers must maintain an ongoing dialogue with employees who request accommodations to ensure their needs are met promptly.
  • The settlement reinforces the importance of employer training on ADA compliance and the necessity of an interactive process when addressing accommodation requests.

Conclusion:
The resolution of this case reminds all employers of their responsibilities under the ADA. By fostering an environment of open communication and flexibility in accommodating workers with disabilities, companies can comply with the law and ensure a more inclusive and productive workplace. ABM’s settlement underscores the significance of addressing accommodation requests promptly and thoroughly, benefiting both the employee and the organization. 

TS
Written by TAP Series Editorial · Reviewed August 20, 2024

Our editorial team researches and fact-checks every article against current workplace, safety, and compliance guidance. This content is for general information and is not legal advice.